[HQ Ignorance] Namaless One's Riddle

Loran aillet_l at yahoo.fr
Wed Feb 7 10:26:42 UTC 2007


Hello to all
Ok once again I see that several brains acting together are more than the simple addition of single intelligence. Wonder of the human synergy !
You are right, we don't have to jump on the first idea. I propose to organize our thoughts here

Let's see the riddles and potential answers :

>"I have donated a gift to all of you everything you know.
> This gift can fly, this gift can crawl, it is saved, it is wasted, yet still it eats all."

-> The Gift could be TIME (thanks to Andrew)

> "When the Kingdoms of Men fight among themselves,
> the Kingdom of War will seek peace as Lord Death
> on a Horse will bring the greatest of all evils to the
> land.

-> Seek peace ? because of Lord Death on a Horse ?
-> Any idea on the Greatest of all evils ?
- War (Death) to all ?

- Devil (Chaos) to all ?

> So great that it will may even slay me.

-> What can kill this spirit ?

> The Beastmen shall arise again and the forests shall grow."

-> Well not only the elf position is questionable here...
I believe that this sentence need a close look.

> "You think the three weapons of Talor are a
> greatsword, an axe and a flail? I have come to tell
> you that they are not what you think they are."

-> Ok noted

> "Bearer of the banner, you have one chance.

-> See... we have to be careful

> Confer among yourselves, and name me correctly

-> Should we name the Nameless One or the Gift ?
(Lev, perhaps you could tell and make it clearer here, if it is my english level that is not hight enough)

> I shall tell
> you of their secret of the weapons of Talor for then I
> shall know that you are worthy to protect mankind -
> for I *am* a man."

-> Ok protecting mankind seems to be protecting the Nameless One
To me, the Nameless One is more a criminal than a virtuous guy.
(Lev, could you inform us on with general knowledge on the Nameless One?)

I think he could be someting more much conceptual than the first human : Human sins or failures for exemple, which would define mankind more in the hrestoli way. Without failure, no humanity, no redemption.. etc...

Any advice ?
Loran



	

	
		
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! 
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses 
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mimesisrpg.com/pipermail/ignorance_mimesisrpg.com/attachments/20070207/e9563f1c/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ignorance mailing list